I can have restless expectations, and I can have sublimely calm expectations. So, to say that all expectations are part of the restless mind would not be accurate, in my experience. Some expectations are part of the restless mind; some expectations are part of the calm, blissful mind.
I’ve also previously addressed the notion of surrendering “personal” desires, and how that language is ultimately problematic. If you portray the word “personal” as being intrinsically negative, that is a big problem, just as portraying “self” as intrinsically negative is a big problem. The problem isn’t personal desires; they don’t “short-circuit the divine flow”, as Yogani says. What short-circuits the divine flow is anti-personal desires that either harm ourselves or those around us. It is the desires and expectations that run contrary (anti-) to the health and well-being of personalities that are injurious to us and therefore against the divine flow.
Can a personal desire of mine be injurious? Yes. But can a personal desire of mine be liberating and infused with divinity? Absolutely.
If my personal desire is to love everybody unconditionally, then my personal desire is aligned with divine flow, isn’t it? How then can you say that “personal desires” short-circuit the divine flow? You see?–the rhetoric of demonizing “personal” is not coherent, sound, or helpful.
What happens is that our personal desires merge with the transpersonal flow of stillness in action, divine love, and so forth. That’s not impersonal, because our personality is still involved, and enriched by the process.
I’ve reviewed this before, so I’m not trying to change either Yogani’s or your use of the language. But for others who have a more discerning eye for language and for the context and meaning of words, they may appreciate the distinction I’m making here. It’s subtle, but important.
I was playing frisbee golf earlier this afternoon with a friend, and the course meanders through Florida swampland, so there are some water hazards. Along the way, each of us lost a disc when launching them over particular swamp holes. We tried to retrieve them with some tree branches, but to no avail. So, we didn’t complain or gripe much; we just moved on, and joked about offering them to the frisbee gods. What did we surrender? Well, we surrendered our discs, accidentally. Then we surrendered and transformed the temporary remorse and frustration of losing the discs. But we didn’t completely drop the expectation that next time–just maybe–we could complete the course without losing a disc. We still held onto some hope that next time we could walk away with all of our discs. The expectation, belief, and desire to keep all of discs will remain in place. That’s how improvement, learning, and refinement of skills occur: you operate within a framework of expectations, beliefs, desires, visions of the future, and so on.
Furthermore, the sutras of samyama have specific meanings, and therefore generate specific outcomes. So, when I release “unity”, of course I’m expecting “unity” to manifest in some form. I don’t worry about the exactness of the manifestation, but I expect that unity will indeed come into my life and the lives of others.
The problem here is a matter of being a little too loose, and a little too lazy, with language. Yogani’s rhetoric is like 97% solid, in my view, but this matter regarding “personal” and “expectations” is part of the 3% that is erroneous.
But again, I don’t expect you or Yogani to change your vocabulary based on my insight. What I do expect is for some other wise minds to eventually comprehend and resonate with the points I’m making. If those wise minds don’t show up, or fall short of speaking with a rational level of understanding, that’s OK too. My expectations are loosely held. My language, however, is tight and snug when it needs to be.
To summarize…for those with open, linguistic minds, the advice from me is to refrain from demonizing the words “personal” or “expectations”. The demonization won’t serve your practice. What will serve your practice is to continue to feed stillness with your desires, expectations, visions, etc., without worrying about eradicating personal desires and expectations in the process. Good self-inquiry will investigate the kind and quality of personal desires and expectations, without blindly trying to kill them. Imbue your personal desires and expectations with the stuff of miracles. Saturate them. Like that.